Sign-up for {N}power to get exclusive discounts, newsletters, members-only features, and more!
39.709921, -104.987224
Denver - Design District - Alameda and Broadway
368 S Broadway
Denver, CO 80209
United States
As part of its job as a consumer protection agency, the Food and Drug Administration requires that food manufacturers label their products so consumers know just what they are getting. By law, all labels must clearly state what’s in the product—all ingredients, including artificial ingredients, preservatives, and additives—and how the food was processed. For instance, labels must state whether the food is “fresh” or “from concentrate,” and if the food has been irradiated or pasteurized. If there is concern about the safety of an ingredient, the label must carry a health warning stating so.1
This “truth in labeling” philosophy does not include genetically-modified organisms (GMOs). In 1992, the FDA declared that foods containing GMOs need not be labeled as such, deeming these foods “Generally Recognized as Safe.” According to US law, for a substance to obtain this status, “the substance must be the subject of a substantial amount of peer-reviewed studies and there must be overwhelming consensus among the scientific community that the product is safe.” Genetically-modified foods did not meet either criteria. More recently, largely due to public outcry, the National Bioengineered Food Disclosure Standard was implemented. While this law does require manufacturers to disclose when a product contains some types of GMOs, it falls short in many important ways. First, the labeling standard only requires disclosure of detectable GMOs. This loophole exempts most highly processed foods that are so refined the modified genetic material is undetectable (think foods like corn syrup from GMO corn or soy oil from GMO soybeans). It also exempts meat, eggs, and dairy products, so there is no way to know if an animal was fed GMO feed (the majority of GMO corn and soy is used for animal feed). Confusingly, the Standard also uses the term “bioengineered” instead of the more commonly used GMO. Because of loopholes like these, consumers are still not getting the labeling information they deserve—and there is still no requirement for safety testing. Instead, the biotech companies that create the GMOs are left to determine whether their products are safe, or not.
Unlike traditional breeding, grafting, or cross-pollinating, which succeed or fail by natural processes, genetic engineering involves taking genes from one species and forcing them into the DNA of another species, changing the molecular biology of that organism. To do this, scientists often use bacteria and/or viruses to “infect” the DNA of one organism with the genes of another organism. The result is an organism that would be impossible to obtain through natural processes like crossbreeding or grafting. An internal FDA document confirms that, “The processes of genetic engineering and traditional breeding are different and according to the technical experts in the agency, they lead to different risks.”3
Proponents tout the benefits of genetically-modified crops—vitamin fortified grains, highly productive crops that would feed millions of starving people, etc. But in fact, the only two traits found in nearly all commercialized genetically-modified plants are herbicide tolerance and/or pesticide production.4 This means that the plant is resistant to large doses of herbicides or that the plant produces pesticides in its own cells. In fact, the widespread use of genetically-modified crops engineered to tolerate herbicides has led to a sharp increase of the chemicals in the U.S. and is creating herbicide-resistant “super weeds” and an increase in chemical residues in U.S. food, according to a report released in late 2009. As more farmers have adopted variations of corn, soy beans, and cotton bred to tolerate weed killer in recent years, the use of herbicides has increased steadily, with herbicide use growing by 383 million pounds from 1996 to 2008, according to the report released by The Organic Center, the Union for Concerned Scientists, and the Center for Food Safety.5 When GMOs were first introduced into the food supply in the mid-1990s, scientists warned that they were unpredictable and could create foods that were toxic, allergenic, and less nutritious than their conventional counterparts. An increasing number of scientific studies support these concerns.
Consider these statistics: 94 percent of all soybeans grown in this country are genetically modified, 88 percent of all corn is genetically modified, 95 percent of sugar beets and 90 percent of all canola is genetically modified. In fact, it is estimated that 70 percent of the “convenience foods” sold in grocery stores contain some genetically-engineered ingredients.15 Ubiquitous ingredients like lecithin, xanthan gum, corn starch, corn syrup, fructose, soy protein, and soy isolate are often derived from genetically-modified crops like corn or soy. Additionally, conventionally-raised animals are often fed genetically-modified feed and are injected with genetically-engineered hormones. Even the foods you buy at the natural foods store could contain ingredients that have been genetically modified. Because the FDA does not require any labeling on these foods, it is impossible for manufacturers, retailers, or consumers to tell which foods may contain genetically-engineered ingredients.
In late 2015, against widespread consumer and business opposition, the FDA approved AquaBounty’s genetically modified salmon—the first genetically engineered animal—for sale in the United States.16 Commercialization of the fish was delayed while the FDA sorted out the question of labeling it. But sales of the controversial farmed GM salmon have started in Canada and it is not labeled.
The fish, which grows much faster and larger than conventional salmon, is made by inserting a fragment of DNA from the ocean pout fish (a type of eel), along with a growth hormone gene from Chinook Pacific salmon, into a fertilized Atlantic salmon egg.17 The FDA’s food safety evaluation of GM salmon was widely criticized as grossly inadequate. For example, the FDA treats the salmon as if it were an animal drug, not a food for human consumption. The agency didn’t conduct its own safety studies. It also dismissed data showing elevated levels of IGF-1 (insulin-like growth factor) that may significantly increase the risk of colorectal, breast, and prostate cancer. Data also suggests potentially increased allergenicity and higher levels of antibiotics in the fish.18 Most people say they do not want to eat the fish and take unintended risks with their health.
To avoid GM salmon when traveling in Canada, either don’t eat salmon or buy only wild caught.
If and when GM salmon is commercialized in the United States, know that there is a commercial boycott of it in place with restaurants, chefs, and grocery retailers pledging to keep GM salmon out of their establishments. More than 80 grocery store chains across the United States have made firm commitments to not sell GM salmon.19 Rest assured that Natural Grocers is a chain that has made that commitment.
At Natural Grocers, we strive to offer our customers the absolute safest and highest-quality natural products available. While we don’t carry products that disclose that they contain bioengineered (BE) ingredients, the truth is that some of the natural products on the market, including some sold at our stores, have the potential to contain GMOs. Because companies are only required to disclose detectable GMO ingredients, it is hard to know which products contain GMOs, unless they are labeled as USDA organic or “non-GMO.” We make it a priority to stock many organic items (which do not allow GMOs) and look for new products that state “non-GM corn,” “non-GM soy” or “no GMOs” on the label. That said, we do have a number of very popular, longtime brands on our shelves that are not USDA organic or do not make the statement “no GMOs” in which case you can assume that there is the potential for the product to contain genetically-modified ingredients. Unfortunately, it is beyond our abilities as a retailer to do much more than advocate for better labeling laws and continue to offer GMO-free and organic products in our stores.
Of course, avoiding any foods labeled with as “bioengineered” or “BE” is a good place to start, but to truly avoid all GMOs your best bet is to buy from companies that label their products as non-GMO and opt for organic. The National Organic Standards Board prohibits the use of GMOs in organic production and requires 100-percent organic feed for organic livestock.20 But be aware that as genetically-modified crops become more prevalent, the spread of their seeds and pollen is a serious concern. Even organic foods may be contaminated with traces of GMOs that have been spread by the wind, birds, or bees.
Visit these websites for more information on genetically-modified foods and ways to get involved:
Sign-up for {N}power to get exclusive discounts, newsletters, members-only features, and more!